UI/UX design services
that survive contact
with real users.

Cost tracks screen count, research depth and whether a design system is included. A focused marketing site sits in a very different bracket to a SaaS product with sixty screens, permission-dependent states and a component library to be maintained afterwards. We scope against a written brief after discovery and quote a fixed figure, so there is no hourly drift.

A typical product engagement runs about eight weeks. That breaks down as two weeks of discovery and research, two weeks of architecture and wireframes, and two weeks of visual design and system build. Prototyping and usability testing take a week, with handoff in week eight. Large platforms with many permission-dependent states take longer, and a landing page or focused redesign takes considerably less.

UX is the decision-making: who the product serves, what tasks matter, how information is structured and how a flow should work. UI is the execution: type, colour, spacing, components and states that make that structure usable and coherent. They are not separable in practice. A beautiful interface over a badly structured flow still fails, and a well-reasoned flow with unreadable typography never gets used long enough to prove itself.

Research is part of every product engagement, not an upsell. We interview real users and the people who support them, review your analytics and session recordings, and run usability testing at prototype stage. Where a client genuinely only needs visual execution against decisions already made, we will scope that honestly rather than charge for research nobody intends to act on.

Yes. Most engagements extend something rather than replace it. We audit what exists, keep what is working, and document where the system has gaps or inconsistencies that are costing your team time. If the existing system is genuinely holding the product back we will say so and cost the alternative, but that is a recommendation rather than a default.

Either. Handoff includes tokens, component specs, redlines, motion timings, responsive behaviour and a walkthrough session, and we stay available through the build to review the implementation against the design. We also build: web on Next.js and React, mobile on Swift, Kotlin or React Native. That suits you if you would rather one team carried the work from research through to production.

Yes, to WCAG 2.2 AA as standard rather than as a paid add-on. Contrast ratios, visible focus order, keyboard-completable flows, tap target sizes and screen-reader labelling are decided during design. It is dramatically cheaper to build in than to retrofit, and it widens who can use the product. In a growing number of markets it is also a legal requirement rather than a preference.

You do. Figma files, research recordings and documentation are yours, delivered in your own workspace rather than shared from ours, with full edit access and version history intact. If you move to another design partner later, everything goes with you — including the reasoning behind the decisions, which is usually the part that is hardest to replace.